Sunday, November 30, 2003

REGARDING MY "MORE ON THE 'JAMES OSSUARY'" POST BELOW, Seth Sanders e-mails:

To uphold the tradition of philology, I will pick a nit:

Still, I would like to see the refutation published in a peer-review journal in more detail than has been presented so far.


Um, am I missing something or isn't the normal order for something to be *published* in a peer-reviewed journal before being *refuted* in a peer-reviewed journal?


Touch�. Can we have both maybe? Or else forget about the whole thing?

No comments:

Post a Comment